We determined the U. at each position by measuring what every college should strive to do, in sports and beyond: Prepare students for professional .

In order to make it modern, we used a 10-year data set. Dipping further back would mean going across different coaching eras at the college level, as well as including a lot of players who are no longer active in the NFL. (We did run an unofficial 20-year data set for the quarterback position, which you can read about below.)

We came up with a scoring system that balanced not just the quantity of players programs put into the NFL, but the quality of those players’ careers. One measure we used is draft position—an inexact but still relevant measure of a player’s approximate value when he left college. We credited players for career games started. But rather than assigning a point value to every game started, which would weigh too heavily in favor of older players, we lessened that effect by using ranges.

We also awarded points for the highest achievements (MVP, and for non-quarterbacks, Offensive/Defensive Player of the Year and All-Pro) and awarded a smaller amount of credit for Rookie of the Year, an indication of a player’s preparedness when entering the league. (We made the decision to exclude the Pro Bowl. Between fan voting and the league’s need to dig deep into the pool of alternates with so many players dropping out annually, there’s been a reduction in the legitimacy of that achievement.)

Read More…